Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Date: 2017-11-30 01:32:23
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ0ztsu3jouCqgFrkYLLT2FQDE2JLPtyhsaFUJurc_iOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The latest patch is good. It lacks a test that verifies the serialize
> support with actual parallel workers, so in case if it broken, it is
> difficult to know.

Could this question be answered? The patch still applies so I am
moving it to next CF.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 01:34:40 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 01:29:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Improve OR conditions on joined columns (common star schema problem)