Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Date: 2017-12-01 05:32:13
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ=pA_bry+kW8WG_LnRPeTxF1y8MkwK=Fvyjs_Z2RkziQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com> wrote:
> It would at least be dump-and-restore hazard if we don't let them in.
> The new version allows NaNs.
>
>> This gives a wrong result for NaN-containing objects.
>
> I removed the NaN aware comparisons from FP macros, and carefully
> reviewed the places that needs to be NaN aware.
>
> I am sorry that it took so long for me to post the new versions. The
> more I get into this the more problems I find. The new versions
> include non-trivial changes. I would be glad if you can look into
> them.

I have moved this patch to next CF, with "needs review" as status as a
new version has been posted.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-12-01 05:34:34 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-12-01 05:31:01 Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks