Re: Proposal: INSERT ... BY NAME

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: INSERT ... BY NAME
Date: 2026-07-22 12:12:02
Message-ID: CAB-JLwbR7tBCggXdpfrsMtkJgh8=V+WOTk4oQtErww5xpfm-XA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em qua., 22 de jul. de 2026 às 08:39, Ayush Tiwari <
ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com> escreveu:

> Only the *bare* VALUES form is rejected, since a VALUES row has no column
> names of its own. Maybe I'll reword the docs to make that distinction
> clear.
>

yeap, I tested and it works, but it would be good to mention that only
unnamed values don't work.

regards
Marcos

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-07-22 12:31:49 Re: convert various variables to atomics
Previous Message xiaoyu liu 2026-07-22 11:55:50 Re: Many of psql's describe functions bloat cache / waste mem