| From: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: REPACK and naming |
| Date: | 2025-09-17 12:04:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAB-JLwaRXQPZ7Sj42-66dXtvkrx=5rxW7w=vszppekUxspDiAw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em ter., 16 de set. de 2025 às 23:01, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:
> I think RETABLE is not a proposal to be taken seriously. That's
> extremely confusing.
>
This feature could be used in a future version to rearrange fields in a
table, for better padding.
I don't think we have another one available for this purpose.
CREATE TABLE T(A text, B integer, C bigint, D integer);
We could have something like
RETABLE T USING(B, D, C, A)
So REPACK isn't the best for this, if this feature would exist some day.
regards
Marcos
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2025-09-17 12:21:52 | Re: Parallel Apply |
| Previous Message | Greg Burd | 2025-09-17 11:59:15 | Re: [PATCH] Add tests for Bitmapset |