Re: Trigger position

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trigger position
Date: 2021-09-15 12:12:07
Message-ID: CAB-JLwaQsqw7BZZ0bcTd+uckyv2v8LR2OP-kwSRrVu6_u=nwsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This way would be interesting for those are migrating from these databases
too. But ok, I´ll forget it.

Em qua., 15 de set. de 2021 às 08:40, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> escreveu:

> Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> > Alphabetical order of triggers sometimes makes me write a_Recalc or
> z_Calc
> > to be sure it´ll be the first or the last trigger with same event of that
> > table
>
> > Oracle and SQL Server have FOLLOWS and PRECEDES when defining trigger
> > execution order. Firebird has POSITION, which I like it more.
>
> Color me skeptical: doesn't that introduce more complication without
> fundamentally solving anything? You still don't know which position
> numbers other triggers have used, so it seems like this is just a
> different way to spell the same problem.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2021-09-15 12:19:19 Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication
Previous Message Marcos Pegoraro 2021-09-15 12:10:36 Re: Trigger position