Re: Partial Mode in Aggregate Functions

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partial Mode in Aggregate Functions
Date: 2026-02-25 12:59:38
Message-ID: CAB-JLwZk4dGzqf81s9D6cBKvu95gceb9zc5mBOR6wAX-wb+1DA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em sáb., 21 de fev. de 2026 às 14:56, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> escreveu:

> Fair, people do guess when exposed to an unknown technical term instead of
> searching out its definition. Rename the column to "Parallel Execution?"
> to avoid that. I agree unless you are writing a new aggregate the exact
> technical feature name we used is unimportant. Whether it can be totally
> suppressed here or left to a footnote would need to be decided.
>

Perhaps this way we will have a better understanding of this case.

regards
Marcos

Attachment Content-Type Size
V1-0001 [PATCH] Change definition of Partial Mode in Aggregate Functions.diff application/octet-stream 6.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2026-02-25 13:05:46 [PATCH] Simplify SortSupport implementation for macaddr
Previous Message jian he 2026-02-25 12:46:40 Re: Enable partitionwise join for partition keys wrapped by RelabelType