Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Date: 2025-09-25 20:20:34
Message-ID: CAB-JLwZTViGAi01hC9_G4HNwL59W4tKovFPuoL+7ZLwsiKDiiw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em qui., 25 de set. de 2025 às 15:12, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
escreveu:

Some typos I've found on usage of pg_repackdb.

+ printf(_(" -n, --schema=SCHEMA repack tables in the
specified schema(s) only\n"));
+ printf(_(" -N, --exclude-schema=SCHEMA do not repack tables in the
specified schema(s)\n"));
both options can point to a single schema, so "(s)" should be removed.
"in the specified schema(s)" should be "in the specified schema"

Same occurs on this one, which should be table, not table(s)
+ printf(_(" -t, --table='TABLE' repack specific table(s)
only\n"));

regards
Marcos

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-09-25 20:47:36 Remove unused for_all_tables field from AlterPublicationStmt
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-09-25 20:11:14 Re: Avoiding roundoff error in pg_sleep()