| From: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why mention to Oracle ? |
| Date: | 2024-09-20 17:48:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAB-JLwZM3nUZAABciCRqOXrHSN2jEOxXBsOFcTvf1Qd_1OyBPw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em sex., 20 de set. de 2024 às 13:18, David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> escreveu:
> It would be a boon to the community if someone were to put together a
> web/wiki page or mini-app that details this kind of information and, if
> considered accurate and relevant enough by the community, link to that more
> globally while also remove the random and incomplete references of this
> nature from the main documentation. As it stands the info is at least
> relevant, and its incompleteness doesn't cause enough grief, IMO, to
> warrant its outright removal absent there existing an alternative.
>
Oracle DOCs or MySQL DOCs or any other have these comparisons ? I don't
think so, so why does Postgres have to mention it ?
All these places, and others I didn't find, I think it's correct to say
Postgres' way of doing that, not what is different from Oracle.
regards
Marcos
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-09-20 18:00:32 | Re: Why mention to Oracle ? |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2024-09-20 17:47:43 | Re: First draft of PG 17 release notes |