| From: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: logical replication restrictions |
| Date: | 2021-09-23 10:22:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAB-JLwYPHDhd_esvv5zDLRJoQCavz5Le9EhCPAQE33JAfKmGPg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> What kind of reasons do you see where users prefer to delay except to
> avoid data loss in the case where users unintentionally removed some
> data from the primary?
>
>
> Debugging. Suppose I have a problem, but that problem occurs once a week
or a month. When this problem occurs again a monitoring system sends me a
message ... Hey, that problem occurred again. Then, as I configured my
replica to Delay = '30 min', I have time to connect to it and wait, record
by record coming and see exactly what made that mistake.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-09-23 10:27:17 | Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-09-23 10:18:57 | Re: Column Filtering in Logical Replication |