Re: Get rid of "Section.N.N.N" on DOCs

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Get rid of "Section.N.N.N" on DOCs
Date: 2025-12-15 12:12:57
Message-ID: CAB-JLwYLvPSAu5ObNyWZSaVO8x64KJabSuH0BcQsG2u2ccxCfA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em seg., 15 de dez. de 2025 às 03:49, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
escreveu:

> For more information on the use of statistics by the PostgreSQL query
> planner,
> refer to [Section 14.2].
>
> With the change you propose, that would become
>
> For more information on the use of statistics by the PostgreSQL query
> planner,
> refer to [Statistics Used By The Planner].
>

I'm aware of that and I think in this case we need to change both
sides. The source needs to have the tag to be displayed, and on the pages
where it's used, we need to adapt it so that it's displayed accordingly.

But we can start by changing the ones we're sure of. If I haven't
miscounted, there are about 1,500 places in the documentation where a
Section n.n.n exists, but changing one source will correct 20 or 50 links
of it. I'll change a few and see how it goes.

regards
Marcos

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2025-12-15 12:19:10 Re: Get rid of "Section.N.N.N" on DOCs
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-12-15 11:58:40 Re: Confused static assertion implementation