| From: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Get rid of "Section.N.N.N" on DOCs |
| Date: | 2025-12-28 15:26:19 |
| Message-ID: | CAB-JLwYBTSD=89N5UV9zCx4ZdCpDi8oB8_6ULt=3ys6hCEfeyQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em dom., 28 de dez. de 2025 às 10:55, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
escreveu:
> Personally, I don't want that. I think changing to section number plus
> title could have some merit, but just the title seems inferior to me.
> But that's just me.
But this way it wouldn't be too polluted for the Chapters ?
For more information on logical replication, see Chapter 29. Through the
logical decoding interface (Chapter 47)
would be
For more information on logical replication, see Chapter 29. Logical
Replication. Through the logical decoding interface (Chapter 47. Logical
Decoding)
regards
Marcos
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2025-12-28 15:27:37 | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Storage I/O Transformation Hooks |
| Previous Message | Henson Choi | 2025-12-28 15:25:01 | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Storage I/O Transformation Hooks |