Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Matt Kelly <mkellycs(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.
Date: 2015-12-27 06:44:38
Message-ID: CAB=Je-HvNg-K7CUvbraOKOKpTqi9yo=TazcKp-WKT1KziOHJPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>and fetch a number of rows that, by its estimation, would fit in the memory available

What's wrong with having size limit in the first place? It seems to
make much more sense.

Vladimir

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-12-27 07:11:50 Re: Add numeric_trim(numeric)
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2015-12-27 05:12:05 Re: Fuzzy substring searching with the pg_trgm extension