| From: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "James Pang (chaolpan)" <chaolpan(at)cisco(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete |
| Date: | 2022-09-08 07:05:14 |
| Message-ID: | CAB=Je-HuM6t=8kiVCnqAisk3PfO9y7HmKWpzjCyDZWMXaeA5vg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-performance |
> > Yesterday, when workload test, a lot of Postgresql JDBC connections
> > use 150-160MB memory , so we got ERROR: out of memory
Would you please share a reproducer? (e.g. DDL for the table, test code)
Have you tried capturing memory context information for the backend that
consumes memory?
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ#Examining_backend_memory_use
Vladimir
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Pang (chaolpan) | 2022-09-08 08:24:03 | RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete |
| Previous Message | James Pang (chaolpan) | 2022-09-08 06:17:39 | RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Pang (chaolpan) | 2022-09-08 08:24:03 | RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete |
| Previous Message | James Pang (chaolpan) | 2022-09-08 06:17:39 | RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete |