Re: JDBC behaviour

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sridhar N Bamandlapally <sridhar(dot)bn1(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JDBC behaviour
Date: 2016-02-18 08:30:49
Message-ID: CAB=Je-Haw2fcmXp53gx78DF7noP5neVzuaddJYm0TWMnUevG1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

> but in this case all these transactions are independent with autocommit off,

At database level, there is no "autocommit=off".
There's just "begin-end".

It is database who forbids .commit, not the JDBC driver.
Vladimir

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sridhar N Bamandlapally 2016-02-18 08:51:47 Re: JDBC behaviour
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2016-02-18 08:30:27 Re: JDBC behaviour

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-02-18 08:33:13 Re: pg_ctl promote wait
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2016-02-18 08:30:27 Re: JDBC behaviour

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sridhar N Bamandlapally 2016-02-18 08:51:47 Re: JDBC behaviour
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2016-02-18 08:30:27 Re: JDBC behaviour