Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)

From: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Nelson <stephen(at)eccostudio(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
Date: 2016-01-19 12:29:34
Message-ID: CAB=Je-HTGQ=2gEh6hK45+WndntroMFSTcLuqwa43bcMwER2BFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

>What do you think about this approach?

As long as <dependency>...</depencency> is there, mvn would complain
on "missing dependency".
The only sane way of excluding dependency "on demand" is maven profiles.

Vladimir

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-01-19 13:33:41 Re: Re: [JDBC] 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2016-01-19 12:06:21 Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)