Re: Preventing non-superusers from altering session authorization

From: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Preventing non-superusers from altering session authorization
Date: 2023-07-10 20:46:07
Message-ID: CAAvxfHevUrGHQk=xg4qyROvwTXyxtZTX8oEYH_6cfnpSwa1t9g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:32 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Okay. Here's a new patch set in which I believe I've addressed all
> feedback. I didn't keep the GetAuthenticatedUserIsSuperuser() helper
> function around, as I didn't see a strong need for it.

Thanks, I think the patch set looks good to go!

> And I haven't
> touched the "is_superuser" GUC, either. I figured we can take up any
> changes for it in the other thread.

Yeah, I think that makes sense.

Thanks,
Joe Koshakow

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2023-07-10 20:49:55 Re: Preventing non-superusers from altering session authorization
Previous Message Nikolay Samokhvalov 2023-07-10 20:36:39 Re: pg_upgrade instructions involving "rsync --size-only" might lead to standby corruption?