Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem
Date: 2023-09-08 05:23:28
Message-ID: CAApHDvrysy_z0ynH+TkK-YJ9fns0PN2y=RfB6oJaeS-7rhFgAQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 15:24, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Adjusted patch attached.

This looks mostly fine to me modulo "sort or hash". I do see many
instances of "and/or" in the docs. Maybe that would work better.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-09-08 05:26:05 Re: Eager page freeze criteria clarification
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-09-08 05:22:09 Re: pg_ctl start may return 0 even if the postmaster has been already started on Windows