From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Reducing the chunk header sizes on all memory context types |
Date: | 2022-10-04 08:35:55 |
Message-ID: | CAApHDvrxyptOugW0aR8eF9iD+kzoFyKtoMTyhOHUyctKc9kLdw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 at 13:35, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Revisiting my work on reducing memory consumption, I found this patch left out.
> I'm not sure I can help.
> But basically I was able to write and read the block size, in the chunk.
> Could it be the case of writing and reading the context pointer in the same way?
> Sure this leads to some performance loss, but would it make it possible to get the context pointer from the chunk?
> In other words, would it be possible to save the context pointer and compare it later in MemoryContextContains?
I'm not really sure I understand the intention of the patch. The
header size for all our memory contexts was already reduced in
c6e0fe1f2. The patch you sent seems to pre-date that commit.
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | bt22nakamorit | 2022-10-04 08:41:12 | JUMBLE_SIZE macro in two files |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-10-04 08:31:12 | Re: Assorted fixes related to WAL files (was: Use XLogFromFileName() in pg_resetwal to parse position from WAL file) |