Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, "Andrey V(dot) Lepikhov" <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: GROUP BY optimization
Date: 2022-08-02 11:14:37
Message-ID: CAApHDvruRZ0cVw0rsjoGSgoQF5fn2UoJ2cWLgZSVza0M1Y1KPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 22:21, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 09:46:51PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > I agree this is a mistake in db0d67db2 that makes the test useless.
>
> Tomas, please note that this is an open item assigned to you. Are you
> planning to do something with these regression tests by beta3?

There's still something to do there for PG15, but 1349d2790 (just gone
in to master) made those two tests run as a parallel query again.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2022-08-02 11:21:04 Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2022-08-02 10:58:10 Re: PostgreSQL 15 minor fixes in protocol.sgml