Re: [PATCH] Add memory/disk usage for Function Scan nodes in EXPLAIN

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tatsuya Kawata <kawatatatsuya0913(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Yash Jadhav <yash(dot)jadhav8008(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add memory/disk usage for Function Scan nodes in EXPLAIN
Date: 2026-11-10 04:32:24
Message-ID: CAApHDvro152MZcJDiDh1M-mOi2MZ-UvepsyjCLPBSySN3Unguw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 25 Oct 2026 at 03:44, Tatsuya Kawata
<kawatatatsuya0913(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached is v6, based on your patch, which leaves FunctionNext() as is.
> 0001 is v5 as is, and 0002 is your patch with my changes on top. I kept
> them separate so that the changes from your patch are easy to see, but
> 0002 should be squashed into 0001.

Thanks. Looks good now. I made a few small adjustments and pushed.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tender Wang 2026-11-10 04:45:15 Re: MERGE loses UPDATE transition rows when moving rows between partitions
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2026-11-10 04:14:40 Re: Fix cumulative WAL statistics double-counting from parallel workers