Re: enable_resultcache confusion

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: enable_resultcache confusion
Date: 2021-07-11 14:56:58
Message-ID: CAApHDvrkC-GMJxtzHs4+iLh6+o2Uq8voqEQBDwxLKVA1TdKj_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 10 Jul 2021 at 07:30, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 11:35 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I really like that name.
> >
> > I'll wait to see if anyone else wants to voice their opinion before I
> > do any renaming work.
>
> I like it, too.

Great. I've attached my first draft patch to do the renaming.

It would be good to move fairly quickly on this before REL_14_STABLE
and master diverge too much. At the moment the patch applies to both
versions without any issues.

Does anyone not like the proposed name?

David

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Change-the-name-of-the-Result-Cache-node-to-Memoi.patch application/octet-stream 117.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-07-11 15:22:54 Re: enable_resultcache confusion
Previous Message Michail Nikolaev 2021-07-11 13:51:11 Re: Slow standby snapshot