Re: Support tid range scan in parallel?

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support tid range scan in parallel?
Date: 2025-11-27 23:42:14
Message-ID: CAApHDvr7wyBF8YHBWxBGoz8UzG2xNN1xARGXpScZ2SFxo0Vj9w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 at 02:31, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The patch basically adds:
>
> if (!keep_startblock)
> scan->rs_startblock = InvalidBlockNumber;

I've pushed that patch.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-11-28 00:32:01 Re: Add pg_buffercache_mark_dirty[_all] functions to the pg_buffercache
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2025-11-27 22:58:23 Re: https://cfbot.cputube.org - certificate has expired