Re: appendBinaryStringInfo stuff

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: appendBinaryStringInfo stuff
Date: 2022-12-19 22:48:37
Message-ID: CAApHDvqZ-wC0OAaz4q9kpwQCBQaDJci1LNLjnBff_uwO9PwxwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 11:42, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I think Peter is entirely right to question whether *this* type's
> output function is performance-critical. Who's got large tables with
> jsonpath columns? It seems to me the type would mostly only exist
> as constants within queries.

The patch touches code in the path of jsonb's output function too. I
don't think you could claim the same for that.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-12-19 22:48:53 Re: Error-safe user functions
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2022-12-19 22:43:05 Re: allow granting CLUSTER, REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW, and REINDEX