Re: Add palloc_aligned() to allow arbitrary power of 2 memory alignment

On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 at 04:20, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've done a quick look and the patch is looks good to me.
> Let's add tests for these functions, should we? If you think this is an overkill, feel free to trim tests for your taste.

Thanks for doing that. I'm keen to wait a bit and see if we can come
up with a core user of this before adding a test module. However, if
we keep the repalloc() implementation, then I wonder if it might be
worth having a test module for that. I see you're not testing it in
the one you've written. Andres has suggested I remove the repalloc
stuff I added but see my reply to that. I think we should keep it
based on the fact that someone using palloc_aligned might have no idea
if some other code path can call repalloc() on the returned pointer.

David