Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions
Date: 2021-06-30 22:51:51
Message-ID: CAApHDvpzCbPGGtrF7xaVNjP11HJDgK=nqaZqcE6QkhOXf_+Lqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 1 Jul 2021 at 02:58, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 23:34 David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> + while ((rti = bms_next_member(checkPermRels, rti)) > 0)
>> {
>> - RangeTblEntry *rte = (RangeTblEntry *) lfirst(l);
>> + RangeTblEntry *rte = (RangeTblEntry *) list_nth(rangeTable, rti - 1);
>>
>> I'd have expected >= 0 rather than > 0.
>
> Hmm, a valid RT index cannot be 0, so that seems fine to me. Note that RT indexes are added as-is to that bitmapset, not after subtracting 1.

Oh, you're right. My mistake.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2021-06-30 22:53:42 Re: Small clean up in nodeAgg.c
Previous Message David Rowley 2021-06-30 22:47:41 Re: New committers: Daniel Gustafsson and John Naylor