Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL"
Date: 2023-04-11 05:43:04
Message-ID: CAApHDvprBvQRcqQ8h4QYvAyUc5RfGLCECAEYL9gQfm_0TR3VSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 13:44, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Anyway, I'll set an alarm for this time next year so I can check on
> how many inconsistencies have crept back in over the development
> cycle.

That alarm went off today.

There seem to be only 3 "a SQL"s in the docs to change to "an SQL".

This is a pretty old thread, so here's a link [1] to the discussion.

David

[1] https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpML27UqFXnrYO1MJddsKVMQoiZisPvsAGhKE_tsKXquw@mail.gmail.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
a_SQL_to_an_SQL.patch application/octet-stream 1.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-04-11 05:43:25 Re: Fix fseek() detection of unseekable files on WIN32
Previous Message Noah Misch 2023-04-11 05:36:57 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys