On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 11:21, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Hm, does this ever matter from a performance POV? The current code does look
> simpler to read to me. If the overhead is relevant, I'd instead just move the
> code into a static inline?
I didn't particularly find the code in examine_variable() easy to
read. I think what's there now is quite a bit better than what was
there.
bms_get_singleton_member() was added in d25367ec4 for this purpose, so
it seems kinda weird not to use it.
David