Re: apply worker misses closing partition leaves

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: apply worker misses closing partition leaves
Date: 2026-08-26 14:46:23
Message-ID: CAApHDvpNBrz5Y2jq9hh03i-xjQpg+n1MDChFeQCQaNMWbxci4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 at 14:12, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for updating the patch. They basically LGTM, but I suggest
> you to unify changes in 013_partition.pl.

OK, now pushed. I had misassumed the purpose of the ok() message and
had thought it was a failure text to display, rather than a test name.

I did reword it slightly as I didn't like the double negative of "no unclosed".

Thanks for the report and patch.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2026-08-26 14:52:00 Re: how to run the equivalent of 'make install check-world' with meson
Previous Message Marcos Pegoraro 2026-08-26 14:42:44 Re: Correct some doc items due to the REPACK