Re: tuple radix sort

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: tuple radix sort
Date: 2025-10-30 05:01:07
Message-ID: CAApHDvpGd-cHSr5OZ7_JpoTSWDBZAvAkarbkJPd0J3FW9zvFGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 at 16:46, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Oct 30, 2025, at 11:40, John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Are you by chance running with asserts on? It's happened before, so I
> > have to make sure. That makes a big difference here because I disabled
> > diversion thresholds in assert builds so that regression tests (few
> > cases with large inputs) cover the paths I want, in addition to my
> > running a standalone stress test.
>
> Yes, assert is always enabled in my sandbox. I can disable assert and rerun the test later.

Never expect anything meaningful to come from running performance
tests on Assert builds. You should always be rebuilding without
Asserts before doing performance tests.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2025-10-30 05:43:34 Re: tuple radix sort
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-10-30 04:20:55 Re: Have the planner convert COUNT(1) / COUNT(not_null_col) to COUNT(*)