| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Allow a prosupport function to be attached to an aggregate |
| Date: | 2026-08-18 04:56:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvpE-_CnMOQ=Y8wveUk-MrUzsyR66fXGq+R7j_g4tmra8g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 at 18:13, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Commit 42473b3b31 added SupportRequestSimplifyAggref, which the planner issues
> for any Aggref whose function names a support function. Nice, but extensions
> cannot reach it, because there is no way to attach a support function to an
> aggregate:
>
> ALTER FUNCTION pg_catalog.sum(numeric) SUPPORT numeric_support;
> ERROR: "pg_catalog.sum" is an aggregate function
I failed to realise that there was no way to set that for user-defined
aggregates. Not good. While I do agree that lack of extensibility is
not aligned with the spirit of the project, my current thoughts are
that now is a bit late to add this to v19.
Is delaying this until v20 fine for you?
Or does anyone else feel this is a must-fix for v19?
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shinya Kato | 2026-08-18 05:07:02 | pgbench: \gset and \aset should store SQL NULL as the null value |
| Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2026-08-18 04:55:51 | Re: pg_control_checkpoint(): add "data_checksum_version" (Pg19)? |