| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: btoidsortsupport issue |
| Date: | 2026-08-09 21:36:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvp8Sj7e=98zHGV7OndW3wARWpVoz0Ux-0eLV__=RjVvKQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2026 at 09:17, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > This seems to be a duplicate of [1].
>
> I think Peter's point is that that commit (51cd5d6f0) is in
> fact incorrect.
What Peter pointed out has already been pointed out in the thread that
I linked to. I felt it was useful to point out the duplicate to avoid
anyone wasting time looking deeper or producing a duplicate fix. Maybe
I've missed something, but I did try John's fix, and it does make
Peter's test pass, so to me it seems like a duplicate report. What
did I miss?
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2026-08-09 21:38:54 | Re: btoidsortsupport issue |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-08-09 21:17:50 | Re: btoidsortsupport issue |