Re: Tid scan improvements

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Edmund Horner <ejrh00(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tid scan improvements
Date: 2021-01-26 01:22:42
Message-ID: CAApHDvozoYzeBqzVss_oh5HUFFSMZ2afmQQka-wH4xHU2LUE1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 18:16, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've implemented this in the attached.

The bug fix in 0001 is now committed, so I'm just attaching the 0002
patch again after having rebased... This is mostly just to keep the
CFbot happy.

David

Attachment Content-Type Size
v12-0001-Add-TID-Range-Scans-to-support-efficient-scannin.patch text/plain 69.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Chen 2021-01-26 01:31:32 Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-01-26 00:09:44 Re: Key management with tests