Re: Max size per relation for partitioned tables

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Reftel, Bengt Erik Magnus" <Magnus(dot)Reftel(at)skatteetaten(dot)no>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Max size per relation for partitioned tables
Date: 2024-10-29 10:42:24
Message-ID: CAApHDvoT-rZ3a_wMH6qnnaO_zhE=U9vpY2XXiO1njLEDNf2gmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 at 22:01, Reftel, Bengt Erik Magnus
<Magnus(dot)Reftel(at)skatteetaten(dot)no> wrote:
> Thank you! I´ll try to make a change to the documentation to clarify that.

Perhaps a new row after the "relation size" row with "partitioned
table" and upper limit of "32TB * number of partitions" with a comment
"individual partitions cannot exceed 32TB"

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-10-29 11:01:26 Re: Compatibility Issues with Npgsql and .NET Framework 3.5 after Upgrading to PostgreSQL 16.3
Previous Message 馬 騰飛 2024-10-29 03:25:55 RE: Compatibility Issues with Npgsql and .NET Framework 3.5 after Upgrading to PostgreSQL 16.3