Re: Wordsmith pgstat_relation.c header comment

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wordsmith pgstat_relation.c header comment
Date: 2025-09-30 11:25:28
Message-ID: CAApHDvoLLYBcwJG0BGmgt5B9ynxkcCSNdah6FARLh_0uJD_FNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 30 Sept 2025 at 21:52, Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I was working on statistics and realized that the pgstat_relation.c header comment
> is mentioning "function relation" which does not look appropriate and probably a
> typo or copy/paste error in 13619598f108.

Yeah, looks like maybe someone pasted the "relation" over the wrong
word after a copy/paste from pgstat_function.c.

Pushed.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-09-30 11:31:28 Re: pg_restore documentation and --create/--single-transaction limitation
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2025-09-30 11:21:51 Re: anonymous unions (C11)