Re: BUG #19783: Sorted GROUPING SETS return a grouping column's value in a set that leaves it out

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: alpkeles99(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #19783: Sorted GROUPING SETS return a grouping column's value in a set that leaves it out
Date: 2026-10-25 21:27:00
Message-ID: CAApHDvoCs=X3N_WM=jkdtjF+jbQvtfm0ABTTM-GjqidA+k3tXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Mon, 26 Oct 2026 at 03:03, Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> ccing David, should we add this to the PG 19 open items?

I'm looking now. I've added to open items.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shihao zhong 2026-10-25 21:37:12 Re: first_value()/nth_value() with IGNORE NULLS loop forever (EXCLUDE GROUP/TIES, frame past partition end, no ORDER BY)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-10-25 21:16:45 Re: BUG #19784: "no relation entry for relid 1" when costing = ANY (<array expr over max(col)>) in a MinMaxAggPath