| From: | Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement | 
| Date: | 2018-12-05 18:14:57 | 
| Message-ID: | CAAfz9KN_U22Uvv6M4ToGzt+O=T7jjyKA4-14io2At6AU4R+uqA@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
вт, 4 дек. 2018 г. в 20:13, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> Hi
>
> I wrote plpgsql_check https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check.
>
> It is working well, but because it does static analyse only, sometimes it can produces false alarms or it should to stop a analyse, because there are not necessary data.
>
> https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/issues/36
>
> I see one possible solution in introduction of pragma statement with syntax:
>
>   PRAGMA keyword [content to semicolon];
>
> The pragma has a relation to following statement. So the issue 36 can be solved by pragma
>
> PRAGMA cmdtype CREATE;
> EXECUTE format('CREATE TABLE xxx ...
>
> The PRAGMA statement does nothing in runtime. It works only in compile time, and add a pair of key, value to next non pragma statement. This information can be used by some plpgsql extensions.
>
> What do you think about this proposal?
I think it's a good idea in common. But how about multiple PRAGMAs? Consider
  PRAGMA cmdtype CREATE;
  PRAGMA objtype TABLE;
  EXECUTE format('CREATE TABLE');
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-12-05 18:22:23 | Re: slow queries over information schema.tables | 
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-12-05 17:56:57 | Re: slow queries over information schema.tables |