Re: transactions and ecpg

From: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: transactions and ecpg
Date: 2012-09-23 07:29:29
Message-ID: CAAfz9KM8HWcDqmL9O-nv4qBaSR7yThqnhkvbX+55+Z8WRpRq2g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Hey Wayne

2012/9/22 Wayne Cuddy <lists-pgsql(at)useunix(dot)net>

> I'm looking at some code that a coworker ported from Informix to
> Postgres 9.0. The Informix database did not have transaction logging
> enabled thus no begins/aborts/commits/rollbacks where in the original
> code. The way the code has been ported there are still no begin
> statements in the code, only commit and rollback after data changing
> statements are executed.
>
> Question 1: After a commit/rollback does the next SQL statement
> implicitly begin a transaction?
>
Please, read http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-begin.html

>
> Question 2: If we're just examining data via SELECT statements should we
> be issuing COMMIT statements after or are they only required for data
> modifying operations?
>
Please, read http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/transaction-iso.html

>
> Thanks in advance,
> Wayne
>

--
// Dmitriy.

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abhijit Prusty -X (abprusty - UST Global at Cisco) 2012-09-23 14:41:09 HOw to convert unicode to string
Previous Message David Johnston 2012-09-23 01:50:43 Re: