| From: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [DOCS] HOT - correct claim about indexes not referencing old line pointers |
| Date: | 2023-10-05 01:12:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAAaqYe_-VwKJupVgm4sdfJ-cVmaVtpPW5xdeTEscGcJFR8B9fg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 9:42 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 9:36 AM James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Are you thinking we should simply elide the fact that there is pruning
> > that happens outside of HOT? Or add that information onto the HOT
> > page, even though it doesn't directly fit?
>
> I think we should elide it. Maybe with a much larger rewrite there
> would be a good place to include that information, but with the
> current structure, the page is about why HOT is good, and talking
> about pruning that can happen apart from HOT doesn't advance that
> message.
All right, attached is a v3 which attempts to fix the wrong
information with an economy of words. I may at some point submit a
separate patch that adds a broader pruning section, but this at least
brings the docs inline with reality insofar as they address it.
James
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-Correct-HOT-docs-to-account-for-LP_REDIRECT.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-10-05 01:28:29 | Re: Rethink the wait event names for postgres_fdw, dblink and etc |
| Previous Message | Andy Fan | 2023-10-05 01:11:35 | Re: make add_paths_to_append_rel aware of startup cost |