| From: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code |
| Date: | 2020-07-31 14:02:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAAaqYe9b+GxnoCf+5DRbtSk898vtFYzpxciBt6V8kkcZ0yA7Kg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:12 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 07:47, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Patch using int64 attached.
>
> I added this to the open items list for PG13.
>
> David
I'd previously attached a patch [1], and there seemed to be agreement
it was reasonable (lightly so, but I also didn't see any
disagreement); would someone be able to either commit the change or
provide some additional feedback?
Thanks,
James
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-07-31 14:36:58 | Re: Why is pq_begintypsend so slow? |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-07-31 13:00:14 | Re: Is it worth accepting multiple CRLs? |