Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)

From: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Shaun Thomas <shaun(dot)thomas(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Date: 2020-03-07 22:28:14
Message-ID: CAAaqYe9GifNiqXfbSsoxTACiVmOvX=Gr4RWhvRecT0via5Aztg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:45 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > That's what I figured, but as I mentioned I've having trouble figuring
> out
> > how the fact that an analyze is in flight is determined. I assume it's
> > something that lives of the EState or similar, but I'm not seeing
> anything
> > obvious.
>
> AFAIR, it's just whether or not the current planstate node has an
> instrumentation struct attached.
>

Oh, that's easy. Thanks for pointing that out. I'll be attaching a new
patch soon incorporating that check.

James

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Coleman 2020-03-07 22:47:00 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Previous Message David Fetter 2020-03-07 22:13:13 Re: range_agg