Re: 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion

From: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion
Date: 2012-08-14 01:47:40
Message-ID: CAAZKuFagtKDfYGeECyPJeP-Fs43tF0VXRsesHTfcmTnRd7b68A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> To date, I seem to be the only one convinced that this is an actual
> deficiency ...

It is an actual deficiency, and I am convinced.

--
fdr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2012-08-14 02:14:11 Re: SIGFPE handler is naive
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2012-08-14 00:54:50 Re: 9.2 Cascading replication after slave promotion