Re: xlog filename formatting functions in recovery

From: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: xlog filename formatting functions in recovery
Date: 2012-10-18 16:56:05
Message-ID: CAAZKuFYSPNxeM81S=VBJmt+MSE9F89hDuyxSafQRcshzTg03wg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Daniel, I assume you are submitting an updated version based on the
> feedback that has been provided. I will mark this patch returned with
> feedback in the current CF; please submit the next version to CF3.

Thank you for reminding me, so the approach that seems basically
reasonable is to add an overload for these functions to accept a
timeline number, if I read this feedback correctly?

--
fdr

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Crawford 2012-10-18 17:01:37 Re: Deprecating RULES
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2012-10-18 16:48:31 Re: BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown