| From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests |
| Date: | 2023-03-07 00:02:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAAWbhmjRHYG_HN-yuej5Q7tUYuViodXm7BusjUkUyv2fW-+KPQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 6:35 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> I was refreshing my mind with 0001 yesterday, and except for the two
> parts where we need to worry about AUTH_REQ_OK being sent too early
> and the business with gssenc, this is a rather straight-forward. It
> also looks like the the participants of the thread are OK with the
> design you are proposing (list of keywords, potentially negative
> patterns). I think that I can get this part merged for this CF, at
> least, not sure about the rest :p
Thanks! Is there anything that would make the sslcertmode patch more
palatable? Or any particular areas of concern?
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-03-07 00:20:12 | Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-03-07 00:01:03 | Re: Normalization of utility queries in pg_stat_statements |