Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation

From: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, jakub(dot)wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation
Date: 2022-07-06 15:44:18
Message-ID: CAAWbhmjNGogqd8Vb+HfuUKmkFC_Oyew=CmiobwkxxR-ykSuarQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 2:36 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> At Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:33:18 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> > I don't think this can be commited to 15. So I post the fixed version
> > then move this to the next CF.
>
> Then done. Thanks!

Hello! This patchset will need to be rebased over latest -- looks like
b74e94dc27f (Rethink PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_SMGRRELEASE) and 5c279a6d350
(Custom WAL Resource Managers) are interfering.

Thanks,
--Jacob

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-07-06 15:53:06 Re: Issue with pg_stat_subscription_stats
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2022-07-06 15:28:55 Re: [RFC] Improving multi-column filter cardinality estimation using MCVs and HyperLogLog