| From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now |
| Date: | 2022-07-22 23:04:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAAWbhmj1rOpwKvmQafvPQ-kOJ-jnPA7ztCy5ueA_aDtJ6UUJ=g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 1:44 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> ISTM that you're trying to get patches to have zero reviewers if they need
> more reviewers, because that can serve as a signal in the CF app. But to me
> that's a bad proxy.
Okay. I need to put some more thought into what it is that I really
want (and the wiki needs to be updated, because it's suggesting that
the CFM use the Reviewers field in this way as well). Thanks for the
feedback!
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-22 23:50:02 | Re: make -C libpq check fails obscurely if tap tests are disabled |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2022-07-22 23:03:07 | Re: [Commitfest 2022-07] Begins Now |