Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest"

From: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest"
Date: 2022-10-25 22:55:28
Message-ID: CAAWbhmhTAJdw9QSX7MhZpEaAuc9i9P-KZSwZAzOOfN3pzERgrA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 8:45 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2022-08-08 08:37:41 -0700, Jacob Champion wrote:
> > Agreed. This probably bleeds over into the other documentation thread
> > a bit -- how do we want to communicate the subtle points to people in
> > a CF?
>
> We should write a docs patch for it and then reference if from a bunch of
> places. I started down that road a few years back [1] but unfortunately lost
> steam.

As we approach a new CF, I'm reminded of this patch again.

Are there any concerns preventing a consensus here, that I can help
with? I can draft the docs patch that Andres has suggested, if that's
seen as a prerequisite.

Thanks,
--Jacob

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-10-25 23:15:32 Re: parse partition strategy string in gram.y
Previous Message Matheus Alcantara 2022-10-25 22:45:20 Re: [PATCH] Improve tab completion for ALTER TABLE on identity columns