| From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: meson and sslfiles.mk in src/test/ssl/ |
| Date: | 2023-02-22 17:42:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAAWbhmgp_+LJ1di9oOQdzZ+oeN+1qE+PkbQ-=Kjrooh1ZH5b2w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 5:40 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I think the tradeoff here is, given how rarely those rules are used, is
> it worth maintaining duplicate implementations or complicated bridging?
>
> It's clearly something to deal with eventually, but it's not high priority.
Yeah... in the same vein, I originally thought that I'd need to
quickly add VPATH support to sslfiles.mk, but it seems like it just
hasn't been a problem in practice and now I'm glad I didn't spend much
time on it.
I'm happy to contribute cycles to a Meson port when you're ready for
it. From a skim it seems like maybe in-source generation isn't a focus
for Meson [1]. They might encourage us to write custom Python for it
anyway?
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nikolay Samokhvalov | 2023-02-22 17:52:28 | Re: Proposal: %T Prompt parameter for psql for current time (like Oracle has) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-02-22 17:41:52 | Re: wrong query result due to wang plan |