| From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: Docs: Encourage strong server verification with SCRAM |
| Date: | 2023-05-25 19:27:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAAWbhmgjieX6gC1+xtr90Vyf0sEHhpohCwmMg1LFrvVuSH1JWg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:48 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Overall, +1 to tightening the language around the docs in this area.
>
> However, to paraphrase Stephen, I think the language, as currently
> written, makes the problem sound scarier than it actually is, and I
> agree that we should just inline it above.
How does v2 look? I more or less divided the current text into a local
section and a network section. (I'm still not clear on where in the
current text you're wanting me to inline a sudden aside on SCRAM; it
doesn't really seem to fit in any of the existing paragraphs.)
--Jacob
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-docs-encourage-strong-server-verification-with-SC.patch | text/x-patch | 1.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-05-25 19:33:40 | Re: BUG #17946: LC_MONETARY & DO LANGUAGE plperl - BUG |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-05-25 18:48:56 | Re: pg_collation.collversion for C.UTF-8 |