| From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | jreidthompson(at)nc(dot)rr(dot)com, Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DecodeInterval fixes |
| Date: | 2023-08-22 16:58:18 |
| Message-ID: | CAAWbhmgffa8M04oOt=O1wT=DY_h3Wu3+gvMES=4vTh18DYnzwg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:39 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> 0002 and 0003 make this stuff fail, but isn't there a risk that this
> breaks applications that relied on these accidental behaviors?
> Assuming that this is OK makes me nervous.
I wouldn't argue for backpatching, for sure, but I guess I saw this as
falling into the same vein as 5b3c5953 and bcc704b52 which were
already committed.
--Jacob
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2023-08-22 17:11:10 | Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ? |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2023-08-22 16:07:22 | Re: Oversight in reparameterize_path_by_child leading to executor crash |