| From: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Schema version management |
| Date: | 2012-07-14 08:41:21 |
| Message-ID: | CAASwCXfoFtYsmahGHWpcQy_iLXhRz31=FZbnWOq07Y=p2H1WcA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Personally, I hate this proposed nested directory structure. I would
> like to have all objects in one directory.
>
> But there is a lot of "personally" in this thread, of course.
Why do you hate it?
It's a bit like saying,
- I hate database normalization, better to keep all rows in one single
table.
or even,
- I hate directories.
I have thousands of objects, it would be a total mess to keep them all in a
single directory.
Using a normalized directory structure makes sense for the SCM use-case,
I haven't seen any projects where all the files are kept in one directory.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-07-14 09:25:39 | Re: Schema version management |
| Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2012-07-14 07:08:15 | Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework |